I really think that you make a good point (again, inferencing on that you aren't trying to get this to happen; you want to discuss the faults of OOO for not doing more things like this) in that OOO has not done much to create extra enemies for the game. My thoughts on this, is that it probably takes more time to add them into locations and to think about that kind of thing than it takes to code them- take for example the Almirian crusaders. We already have levels that we don't want to use for them because they have other things like phantoms, or don't fit the theme of 'Almire'. Similarly, it would be a lot of effort to add them into the firestorm citadel… and we want variety, so that wouldn't be good either.

What I can't see, is why OOO doesn't expand on their existing system of levels in the clockworks more. Lets look at this-

We've got a stratum, which is subdivided into levels. Each level then has 'parts' to it (unless it is static; e.g. firestorm citadel/jelly farm), which is evident in the case of scenario rooms. Each part has a chance of coming up, and the level is spawned to be 'random' like that, so that you don't feel as though you're fighting the same level hundreds of times even though you are fighting the same level hundreds of times.

So why can't OOO make more 'parts', or better, alternate versions of parts? As long as the section retains the same dimensions, ending, and starting point, shouldn't it fit? I know for a fact that they are constantly integrating new parts in like I'm saying, but what if they were to make new levels based on these existing part edits for us, or sub in more "alternate levels"?

Lets say that they've got a level like graveyard. They could expand by allowing a random League of Almire part be subbed in for it on occasion, give that a name- more random content. Similarly, we could make a few more rooms based on clockwork tunnels, change the pallet to say, the beast world, and then add something akin to your "night howl" to it. Why not create a section of the clockworks containing enemies from the expansion that only spawns if one of the party members has purchased the DLC for it? (lets say that there are 3 F2Pers and 1 P2Per w/OCH in a party together fighting through a deconstruction zone. There would be a chance to fight a ghost mane stalker or 3 on that particular level; said level would also receive a buff in payout by about a hundred crowns due to the difficulty being raised; this would only happen if the P2Per had fought the ghost mane stalkers before however, think about that in terms of game design)

It seems to me like making "new content" would not be so hard, given that you are creative enough with it, and I often feel like OOO misses out on key opportunities to turn something from "this is BS" to "OOO is amazing and I love them"… but that is beside the point of this discussion about the creation of new enemies and why OOO can't make things like you're almost suggesting, OP.

Put simply, my point is that I think that rather than flooding the game with new enemies, OOO needs to learn how to integrate new enemies better first. Good practice for this would be reintroducing key things that were removed, like the tortodrone.

Edit: You moved it to suggestions! You trickster.

All sound like good ideas; I especially like the idea of wolves that split and have extra gimmicks, and you're definitely correct in saying that we need more beasts in the game as well… although I particularly like the idea of micro raptors as beast enemies. +1

Dragons, you say?

Owlites are a no-go being that they're all dead, if an Owlite was fought it'd probably be a ghost. But the other things work.