Yes, I am familiar with the usual meaning of the word mob. However in the context of online gaming, it has come to mean something different. See the following wiki article: Mob (video gaming)
And the expanding hitbox idea would certainly be better suited to a whip. A good opportunity for a jelly themed weapon in my opinion.
Didn't even realize that mob had a different meaning nowadays.
I'm at the point where I want to add in the damage percentage chart I made based on recent suggestions. What do you (anyone who reads this post) think?
in a few words, no I didn't. that would slow down the sword or make the animation ludicrulously fast. is that a word, or I spelled wrong?
I'm pretty sure that is a word. Okay. I can't think of a response. Unless maybe they would only change it by a few frames on each swing to take away time overall. Anyways I plan on redoing the first post, and letting this act as bump for now.
Ok, I've been experimenting with the DVS and the WHB and now I'm like, "wah 0_0?"
First of all, I just don't understand WHATS the point of getting the WHB? Well, yes, its SUPPOSED to "cut through beasts like butter". But if the WHB "cuts through beasts like butter", then the Final Flourish "is an atomic bomb". Are you following me? (Long story put short, the FF is much more efficient for killing beasts than the WHB)
@Papaya One of the main concerns for the WHB is that it's so quickly outdone by the FF. I think the idea is that since it does normal damage (and thus doesn't do less damage to any one monster type), that it evens out- obviously it's not 100% true. This is why I suggested the buff of stun, as according to GWW it's the anti-beast effect. On top of that, stun would actually be helpful in LD (Oh how annoyed the clones + GFs would be).
For general output damage, I need to add in the numbers I made to the original post... some time.
Not to mention the speed of the WHB is slower than DVS, and in many ways that weakens it.
@Thunder I asked if you suggest they change the animation to make a wider swing.